Honestly, I believe that the AI is extremely over optimistic in its evaluation. Some of what GPT is predicting four years out, I see happening this year. The analysis did not take into consideration much of the political disgusting that is occurring right now, and will continue to increase, leading to more destabilization.
As more of the world realizes the global Ponzi scheme that has endured over the last hundred years, I see a very violent take over with the United States becoming a scared little orphan child locked away in a dark closet, ostracized from the rest of the world. What we know of as the United States of America will not be in existence by 2030, and that's being very conservative.
Differences between LLM generated content you've laid out here is, in my opinion, directly tied to cultural differences between their respective creators. In my professional capacity (medicinal products regulatory affairs) over the years I've met and closely worked with numerous professionals from 'both sides of the fence' and their approach was vastly consistent with the differences between content generated under same basic premise with used LLMs. Furthermore, medicinal RA field is waay more internationally standardized (read: almost entirely not susceptible to personal bias - professional, cultural, political or otherwise) unlike current state of the AI industry - make no mistake, IT IS an industry.
Still, for me, both LLMs have added value to your original article by presenting valid points - them being either opposing the or concurring with the original text. I have to give some credit to Deep Seek's over caution regarding admitting imminent crash because the US economy had managed to deeply embed itself in the global economical fabric and for that reason - as long as reserve currency status remains secure - some added resilience should be awarded to the US economy itself. Yet, this is exactly where ChatGPT fills the gap with aging more predictions and details to postulated theme of the original article.
In short:
China =
this is what was and what is, so that's what we have to work with. What might be remains to be seen but it's best not to capsize the boat unless we really REALLY have no choice (then it goes into another extreme, but that'd be a totally different pair of shoes).
USA =
this is what was and what is, so that's what we have to work with. So, let's speculate and see where it might lead us. We'll deal with consequences at the appropriate time (if ever).
In either case, this back-to-back comparison of the LLMs (to me, at least) presents the proof that - at the current level of development and the state of the scientific framework regarding the AI - the very use of the term AI for LLMs is… misnomer at best.
The two articles are very thought provoking and insightful. I think your assessment is on the mark and the AI contrasts are illuminating. Given the last presidential election and the course of the ensuing madness, I have grave doubts about any return to normalcy. There is too much temptation for the morbidly rich to profit from this 1930’s GOP depression era miasma.
Honestly, I believe that the AI is extremely over optimistic in its evaluation. Some of what GPT is predicting four years out, I see happening this year. The analysis did not take into consideration much of the political disgusting that is occurring right now, and will continue to increase, leading to more destabilization.
As more of the world realizes the global Ponzi scheme that has endured over the last hundred years, I see a very violent take over with the United States becoming a scared little orphan child locked away in a dark closet, ostracized from the rest of the world. What we know of as the United States of America will not be in existence by 2030, and that's being very conservative.
Differences between LLM generated content you've laid out here is, in my opinion, directly tied to cultural differences between their respective creators. In my professional capacity (medicinal products regulatory affairs) over the years I've met and closely worked with numerous professionals from 'both sides of the fence' and their approach was vastly consistent with the differences between content generated under same basic premise with used LLMs. Furthermore, medicinal RA field is waay more internationally standardized (read: almost entirely not susceptible to personal bias - professional, cultural, political or otherwise) unlike current state of the AI industry - make no mistake, IT IS an industry.
Still, for me, both LLMs have added value to your original article by presenting valid points - them being either opposing the or concurring with the original text. I have to give some credit to Deep Seek's over caution regarding admitting imminent crash because the US economy had managed to deeply embed itself in the global economical fabric and for that reason - as long as reserve currency status remains secure - some added resilience should be awarded to the US economy itself. Yet, this is exactly where ChatGPT fills the gap with aging more predictions and details to postulated theme of the original article.
In short:
China =
this is what was and what is, so that's what we have to work with. What might be remains to be seen but it's best not to capsize the boat unless we really REALLY have no choice (then it goes into another extreme, but that'd be a totally different pair of shoes).
USA =
this is what was and what is, so that's what we have to work with. So, let's speculate and see where it might lead us. We'll deal with consequences at the appropriate time (if ever).
In either case, this back-to-back comparison of the LLMs (to me, at least) presents the proof that - at the current level of development and the state of the scientific framework regarding the AI - the very use of the term AI for LLMs is… misnomer at best.
The two articles are very thought provoking and insightful. I think your assessment is on the mark and the AI contrasts are illuminating. Given the last presidential election and the course of the ensuing madness, I have grave doubts about any return to normalcy. There is too much temptation for the morbidly rich to profit from this 1930’s GOP depression era miasma.
There ain't no easy fix for this nightmare...see you on the beach my friend (viva la revolution!)
Indeed!